Article Text

Download PDFPDF
New grading classification for paediatric atopic keratoconjunctivitis
  1. Christopher Ashton,
  2. Daniel F P Larkin
  1. Cornea and External Diseases, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust External Disease and Corneal, London, England, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Christopher Ashton; christopherashton{at}nhs.net

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Why are disease activity grading classifications helpful? And is allergic eye disease an example of a disorder for which this is the case? Chandrasekar and colleagues propose a grading system for the chronic bilateral allergic ocular inflammatory disease vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC)1 and its corresponding management. Grading classification systems are important for standardising assessment, communicating the severity of disease during longitudinal follow-up assessments, guiding treatment and for research purposes when analysing study patient populations. VKC is a chronic, recurrent disorder presenting as a spectrum of disease from mild to severe, with distinct clinical features that correlate with inflammation activity. These characteristics make VKC particularly suitable for a grade classification.

A number of previously proposed grading classifications reviewed by Chandrasekar and co-authors each have their merits and limitations. It is noteworthy that none have become widely used in clinical practice. Spadavecchia et al proposed a grading system based on symptoms and examination signs, scored from 0 to >2, with a sum …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Collaborators Not applicable.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles